🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.